[identity profile] jagash.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I stated that if I did not receive a response, I would solicit the information via ATIP. Yes, I'm mean, but I would only target political staffers for the information.

[identity profile] ilanikhan.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)
You'll get an answer, the question is "when". Writing again in a month when no answer has been recieved will get MINO to pressure to get the response out. The last thing they want is a string of monthly letters saying "why haven't you replied yet?"

What information are you asking for?

[identity profile] jagash.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
My thought was all technically recoverable electronic information with his name sent or received by the political staff, the minister and the legal opinions received by Justice Canada. The data requested would be all such data which does not fall under the exclusions of the Access to Information Act.

[identity profile] ilanikhan.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
You asked for this in your letter?

(Legal opinions will be excluded, since they are client-solicitor privilage)

[identity profile] jagash.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 07:01 pm (UTC)(link)
No, I said that if I got no response I would follow up with an ATIP. Mostly as a pseudo-threat and extra pressure. Possibly "Discussions within the department concerning relevant legal opinions". If Bob and Mary send emails discussing the legal opinion, that itself should be outside that privilege I would think.