It's more the tone than the point itself that causes me to want to step in, in this case. Ad hominem, even by implication, isn't something that I find makes for a reasonable, sensible discussion of an issue.
I chose not to freeze comments or anything like that, but I would much prefer people to keep it civil in here; if you and he can discuss it in that mode, go for it!
From:
no subject
Does this mean I shouldn't argue with your friends in your blog?
The arguments are typical of what FPtP advocates often claim and they are based on a very narrow definition of voter beliefs.
As many holes as swiss cheese comes to mind.
From:
no subject
I chose not to freeze comments or anything like that, but I would much prefer people to keep it civil in here; if you and he can discuss it in that mode, go for it!