ironphoenix (
ironphoenix) wrote2011-09-24 12:28 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
"It's not 'class warfare,' it's Christianity."
"Christian" doesn't mean what the far-right fundamentalist capitalists say it does. Susan B. Thistlethwaite explains why in a short and straightforward article. It's not news, but it bears repeating.
no subject
no subject
Caesar (the government) certainly has the right to appropriate what belongs to Caesar (the coin). But this is entirely separate from Christian charity. A Christian is not allowed, far less encouraged, to wrest money from others through threats or guile to give to the poor.
Of course, if you really did live in a Christian nation, there would be no need for socialism, since the better off would share happily with the less fortunate. But there are no such nations, nor have there ever been.
no subject
That said, I agree that systematizing charity is an effort doomed to limited successes at best, and attempting to enforce it is counterproductive. As C.S. Lewis said, "You cannot make men good by law."
no subject
My kingdom is not of this world.
What bothers me is that people don't know who and what a Christian is. By thinking that a Christian is a member or a particular country or race or social group, they lose the option to personally be transformed by the words and life and spirit of Jesus Christ. When people think they are Christians and still suffer in darkness, who is then going to save them?
no subject
The transformation of which you speak is not as common as the term Christian, so we are often poor message-bearers.
On your last sentence... "We are not blind, surely?"
no subject