Here are a couple of experimental results from FaceBook: one person Liked(tm) everything for 2 days; another person didn't Like(tm) anything for 2 weeks.

LJ doesn't have a Like(tm), +1(tm), or other such general-purpose one-click response option, so we have to, brace yourself, use our words here. This is rather likelier to involve thought, but it takes more effort--effort which people hooked on FB/G+/etc. are unused to putting in. As a result, we get less feedback here than we get on other shiny social media (even though the feedback there is ultimately less genuinely connected), so we post less here.

It's frustrating. The marketers are winning, because we are, more than we like to admit, creatures of reflex and habit, and those things are very manipulable. The only defense is mindfulness: awareness of ourselves, our instincts, reflexes, and habits, and claiming our power of choice.
Tags:

From: [identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com


Facebook has made an (externally obvious) turn away from a platform for person-to-person engagement, and into a platform for person-to-product engagement.

The Like button isn't so much a signal to others, as it is a signal to Facebook. As is true for MOST of Facebook's interactions.

I've read some really neat analysis of that: it's a little frightening.

From: [identity profile] ironphoenix.livejournal.com


*nods* The slogan "If you're not paying for It, you're the product" isn't true of everything, but it certainly seems to be so of FaceBook.

From: [identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com


If you have the time and the stomach for it, I strongly recommend reading this very long article all the way to the end.

It's fascinating.

And, I was THIS CLOSE to knuckling under and getting on Facebook before I read it. :-)

From: [identity profile] ironphoenix.livejournal.com


Good--and troubling--article; thanks for the link!

In fact, we could design a system to support our authentic interests, but we would then need to fund it.

And that's why I have a paid LJ account.

From: [identity profile] ironphoenix.livejournal.com


The Russian thing is Complicated(tm), I think. LJ's relationship with the government and activists is not transparent to me; I don't thus far see evidence of wrongdoing, and taking money away from them seems likelier to push them into the arms of the government than otherwise.

From: [identity profile] ironphoenix.livejournal.com


Also, it is a sad irony that that article shows over 1000 FB Likes.

From: [identity profile] dagibbs.livejournal.com


I also like LJ because it shows me EVERYTHING that my "friends" post. Not some filtered guess as to what it thinks I should see. Ok, I can filter LJ down if I want, but that is my control, not its control.


From: (Anonymous)


WG007 here, too lazy to log in. ;)

But yes, I agree with all of what's said here. I "like" this post, if you will.

This has been my ironic comment for the day. Hope you've enjoyed.

From: [identity profile] ironphoenix.livejournal.com


It'd be funnier if I had a FB Like button on the post, but yes!
Edited Date: 2014-08-20 04:14 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] metahacker.livejournal.com


Ayup.

As a stopgap I put polls on most of my entries, to reduce the effort of engaging with / responding to the content. Because people often don't know what to say or feel trite saying the same 2/3 things...but polls ask you to do that, and provide the answers! Words still available for those with energy/resources, of course.

From: [identity profile] ironphoenix.livejournal.com


It's not a bad idea... some of my posts (most notably my reflections) almost never get comments, and I'm curious how many people even read them, to say nothing of the reactions of those who do.
.

Profile

ironphoenix: Raven flying (Default)
ironphoenix

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags